Sainudheen v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/9TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3679 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 962/2015 OF MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
------------------------------------- SAINUDHEEN, S/O. MUHAMMED,AGED 39 YEARS, PULIKKAL HOUSE, MEEMPOD, WEST KODUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. BINDU GOPINATH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH J.
....................................................... ..................................................... Dated this the 30th day of June, 2015 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail filed by the accused in Crime No. 962/2015 of Malappuram Police Station, Malappuram District.
2. When the application came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant submitted before me that the petitioner is implicated in the above crime and now it is alleged that he had committed theft of sand from the banks of a river and thereby committed the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20 and 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. It is the submission that the applicant is innocent of the accusation levelled against him.
3. The Public Prosecutor submitted before me that this is a case where there is theft and recovery is necessary and it is also the submission that if a light attitude is taken in these cases, it will give a wrong signal to the Society.
4. After hearing both sides and also considering the fact that the main offences are under Sections 20 and 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code is incorporated as an additional offence, the following orders passed:
1.
The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days of this order. On such appearance, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to interrogate the petitioner. After interrogation, if the police officer feels that arrest is necessary, he is at liberty to arrest the petitioner. Thereafter, if any recovery is necessary, that also can be made. Thereafter the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned.
2. After release on bail, the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Saturdays in between 10 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two
months.
3. The petitioner shall not commit similar offences during the bail period.
4. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses.
On the above conditions, this anticipatory bail application is allowed.
Sd/- K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH JUDGE rka /true copy.
P.S to Judge.