← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./3739/2015allowed

Abdul Nasar M.T v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-07Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 3739 of 2015 ------------------------------------ CRIME NO. 560/2015 OF PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, KANNUR .......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- ABDUL NASAR M.T., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, ZUHARA MANZIL, MOTTAMBRAM, MADAYI P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.G.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, KANNUR DIST. (THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM).

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA R.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

------------------------------- B.A. No.3739 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

-------------- Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.560 of 2015 of Payangadi Police station registered for the offences under Secs.332, 341 and 506(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that he wrongfully restrained the victim, threatened to cause his death and prevented him from discharging his official duty.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The victim did not sustain any serious injuries. Having regard to this fact, I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner.

In the result, the bail application is allowed. 1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

B.A. No.3739 of 2015 2

2) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

3) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

4) He shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses nor shall he get himself involved in any other criminal case.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

If the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate, this order is not applicable and the learned Magistrate may pass appropriate orders.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge