Unni @ Praveen v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015/18TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3837 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 463/2015 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTITTA --------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A2 AND A5 :
-------------------- ------------------------------
1. UNNI @ PRAVEEN, AGED 25 YEARS S/O. PRASANNAN, CHATHENPARA, MANNIL HOUSE, PULLADU P.O., KOIPURAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
2. VISAKH @ UNNI, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. PK RAJAN, PARAKATHATHIL HOUSE, POOVATHUR MURI, KOIPURAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
3. MAHESH, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNAPILLAI, MAKKUVASSERIL HOUSE, POOVATHUR MURI, KOIPURAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
4. PREJETH KUMAR, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. PRASANNAN, CHATHENPARA MANNIL HOUSE, PULLADU PO KOIPURAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
5. ASWIN, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.SURESH KUMAR, KADAYEKKAL HOUSE, POVATHU MURI, KOIPURAM VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :
------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R. REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
------------------------------------------- B.A.No.3837 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2015
ORDER
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
Petitioners are alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 143,147,148,323,324,365,341 and r/w Section 149 of IPC. 3.
The prosecution case is that the petitioners forcibly took the victim on a motorcycle, wrongfully restrained him and assaulted him with sticks and hands.
4.
Heard.
5.
The wound certificate of the victim shows that he sustained injuries on different parts of his body including head. There was blunt injury on the back. The nature of the injuries make probable the prosecution case that the victim was assaulted with sticks and hands. It was very cruel on the part of the petitioners to commit such offences. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners 2 to 4 are students of B.Com course. Their age indicates that they are not serious students. Merely because they are students, anticipatory bail cannot be granted to them.
In the result, this application is dismissed. K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE pm