Rahul v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3856 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 780/2015 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ..........

PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

----------------------------------------- RAHUL, S/O.RAMANUJAN PILLAI, AGED 20 YEARS, VILAYIL VEEDU, KOVOOR, KOTTUKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI RESPONDENT:

---------------------- STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE S.I. OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

==================== B.A.No. 3856 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is accused of having committed the offence under Section 397 IPC. The prosecution case is that he along with the co-accused committed theft of a motor cycle. 3.

Heard.

4.

The nature of the case does not justify granting anticipatory bail. The stolen articles have so far not been recovered. It is not proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.

In the result, this application is dismissed. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating officer concerned. He may do so, if he is so advised. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge