Babu v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 4010 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 588/2015 OF PETTAH POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ---------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- BABU S/O.VENKITACHALAM, AGED 36 YEARS RESIDING AT T.C.41/498, SEETHA MAHAL, KURIYATHI, MANACAUD P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.T.SHYAM KUMAR SRI.HARISH R. MENON RESPONDENTS :

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PETTAH POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 001.

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V.S. SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.4010 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is accused of having committed the offences under Sections 294(b), 354, 452 and 506(i) of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The first informant is the mother-in-law of the landlord of the petitioner. The prosecution case is that the petitioner trespassed into her house, uttered obscene words, threatened her and pushed her down.

4.

Heard.

5.

It is doubtful whether Section 354 of Indian Penal Code is attracted. Having regard to the nature of the allegations I am of the opinion that detention of the petitioner is not necessary for effective investigation. In the result, this application is allowed.

1.

The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the

B.A. No.4010 of 2015 police in connection with this case.

2.

He shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. 3.

He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.

4.

He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

5.

He shall not destroy or tamper with the evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.

If the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate this order is not applicable and the learned Magistrate may pass appropriate orders.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge