P.Pradeep v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 4097 of 2015 () ------------------------------- (CRIME NOT REGISTERED) PETITIONER :

----------------------- P. PRADEEP, AGED 50 YEARS, PUNARTHAM, KOOTTIKKADA, KOLLAM - 691 020.

BY ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP RESPONDENT :

------------------------- UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CENTRAL EXCISE INTELLIGENCE, KOCHI REGIONAL OFFICE, CENTRAL EXCISE BHAVAN, KATHIKKADAVU, KALOOR.P.O., KOCHI -17, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.4097 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 450 and 392 of Indian Penal Code. 3.

The prosecution case is that along with the coaccused he trespassed into the victim's house and robbed him of Rs.4000/- and gold ornaments.

4.

Heard.

5.

The case was registered in 2013. But the involvement of the petitioner came to light during the investigation of another case; that is how he was made an accused in this case. Having regard to the nature of the allegations it is not at all proper to grant him anticipatory bail.

In the result, this application is dismissed. sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV