Babukuttan @ Rejeesh S v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2015/26TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 4117 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 612/2015 OF MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
..........
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 2 TO 5:
-------------------------------------------------
1. BABUKUTTAN @ REJEESH S, S/O. SASIDHARAN, AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT AMBIKA BHAVAN, PARAYIL, VALIKONAM, MANGALAPURAM, THONNAKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. CHANDRABOSE, S/O. MANIYAN, AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MANGALAPURAM, THONNAKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. SUMESH, S/O. SUDARSHANAN, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MANGALAPURAM, THONNAKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4. SHAMNAD, S/O. SAIFUDEEN, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT SUBINA COTTAGE, MANGALAPURAM, THONNAKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.MADHU SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT/STATE :
--------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA.R THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
---------------------- B.A. No.4117 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of July 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.612 of 2015 of Mangalapuram Police station registered for the offences under Secs.141, 147, 149, 151, 189, 447, 294(b), 353 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that they formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, trespassed into the Police station, committed theft of the key of a Police vehicle and prevented the Police officers from discharging their official duties.
3. Heard both sides.
4. Learned counsel submits that the allegations are false.
5. As of now, there is nothing to show that the allegations are not true. The nature of the allegations does not incline me to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
In the result, the bail application is dismissed.
B.A. No.4117 of 2015 2 Learned counsel submits that the petitioners will surrender before the investigating officer. They may do so if they are so advised. The submission of the learned counsel that the petition has become infructuous so far as the 2nd petitioner is concerned is recorded. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge