Vineeth V v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/11TH BHADRA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5124 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF OCHIRA POLICE STATION, ALLEPPY DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED :
-----------------------------------------
1. VINEETH V., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.VISWANATHAN @ RAJAPPAN, PERIYAKAVIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM, TRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 301.
2. VISWANATHAN @ RAJAPPAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, PERIYAKAVIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM, TRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 301.
3. LALITHA P.S., AGED 56 YEARS, W/O. VISWANATHAN @ RAJAPPAN, PERIYAKAVIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBAGAM, TRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 301.
4. MANU V., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.VISWANATHAN @ RAJAPPAN, PERIYAKAVIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBHAGAM, TRIPUNITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 301. BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.RAJESHKUMAR SMT.T.N.BINDU RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANTS :
------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
2. S.I. OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, OCHIRA POLICE STATION, ALLEPPY DISTRICT.
3. C.I. OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, ALLEPPY DISTRICT.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
A. HARIPRASAD, J.
------------------------------ Bail Appl. No.5124 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of September 2015
O R D E R
Petitioners apprehend that they will be arrested by the Oachira Police.
2. Heard both sides.
3. Learned counsel submitted that Oachira Police is harassing the petitioners for no reason.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no case has been registered by the Oachira Police against the petitioners and their apprehension is without any basis.
5. It is clear from Sec.160 Cr.P.C. that a Police officer has the power to require the attendance of any witnesses in connection with investigation of a crime. However, it is made clear that in the guise of exercising this power, the Police shall not harass the petitioners. Accordingly, the bail application is disposed of. Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE NS