Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/19TH BHADRA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 5207 of 2015 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 487/2015 OF PEECHI POLICE STATION, ThRISSUR ........

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- RAJESH KUMAR, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KORAN, MADATHIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, MOOTHRATHIKKARA DESOM, PARAPPUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT KARUKKUTTI VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEECHI POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ B.A.No.5207 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of September, 2015

O R D E R

Application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.487 of 2015 of Peechi Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 465, 468, 471, 472 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case is that three accused persons with a common intention of deceiving a Co-operative Bank created false documents and availed a loans of Rs.2,00,000/- each causing a total loss of Rs.6,00,000/- to the Bank. On verification, the documents produced by the petitioners were found to be rank forgery.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

B.A.No.5207 of 2015 Considering the nature of allegations and the prosecution case that he is involved in similar offences earlier, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Bail application is dismissed.

Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

AS /True Copy/ P.A. to Judge