Navaneeth Krishnan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5232 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 509/2015 OF KOZHINJAMPARA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT ---------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 :
----------------------------------------- NAVANEETH KRISHNAN, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.KANAKAVEL, PERUMPARACHALLA, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :
-------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOZHINJAMPARA POLICE STATION, KOZHINJAMPARA - 678 555PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R. REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
A. HARIPRASAD, J.
------------------------------ Bail Appl. No.5232 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of October 2015
O R D E R
Bail application filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.509 of 2015 of Kozhinjampara Police station registered for the offences punishable under Secs.420, 465, 468, 471 and read with Sec.120(B) read with Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner along with other accused persons fabricated driving licences.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is no material to implicate the petitioner in this crime. No incriminating document was recovered from the computer centre run by the petitioner nor from the computer recovered from his possession.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application contending that the petitioner is involved in
Bail Appl. No.5232 of 2015 2 another crimes of similar nature. He was arrested and was in custody in that case. Thereafter, he was released on bail. It is revealed that he is involved in this case with identical allegations. It is also contended that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary in this case as well.
Considering the nature of allegations, following directions are issued.
1. The petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within a period of one week and submit himself for interrogation.
2. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.
3. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed by
Bail Appl. No.5232 of 2015 3 him in writing.
4. The petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall they tamper with the evidence.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this Court.
Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE / True Copy / NS/15/10/2015 P.A. To Judge