← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./5236/2015dismissed

Kalidasan v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-04Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/13RD BHADRA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5236 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 72/2015 OF KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTIRCT.

......

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

---------------------------------- KALIDASAN, S/O.ANILKUMAR, AGED 20 YEARS, KALEENDROM, CHERUKARAM, PULLAYIL VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU SMT.S.SEETHA RESPONDENT/STATE:

-------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- B.A. No.5236 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of September, 2015

ORDER

Petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.72 of 2015 of Kilimanoor Police Station registered under Sections 66(E) and 67(B) of the IT Act and Section 13(b) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Prosecution case, in brief, is that the petitioner made a marriage proposal to the victim, a minor girl and obtained her nude photographs. Thereafter he transmitted the same through face book and whatsapp, thereby committed the offences.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

Considering the nature of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner as this is a case wherein custodial interrogation is highly necessary. Therefore, the bail application is dismissed.

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks