Ranjith v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 5292 of 2015 (B) ----------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 835/2015 OF PATHANAPURAM POLICE STATION , KOLLAM PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.2:
---------------------------------------------- RANJITH, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, REJI BHAVAN, THURAVOOR P.O., PURAVATHOOR, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI. ABDUL JALEEL.A RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHANAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl.No. 5292 of 2015 (B) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEUXRE A-1:
THE AFFIDAVIT GIVEN BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 07.09.2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS - NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ww
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
-------------------------------------------------- B.A. No. 5292 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015
O R D E R
The petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 835/2015 of Pathanapuram Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 308, 324, 326, 341 and 506(ii) r/w Section 34 of IPC. 2.
He along with the co accused is alleged to have uttered obscene words, threatened the victim, wrongfully restrained him and assaulted him with dangerous weapons causing him serious injuries. He prays for anticipatory Bail.
3.
Heard.
4.
The earlier application filed by him, Bail Application No. 4502/2015, was dismissed by this Court. Now this application has been filed on the allegation that the matter has been settled between the parties
B.A. No. 5292 of 2015 concerned.
5.
The court cannot take notice of the settlement between the parties as the offences involved are non-compoundable and are of very serious nature. So on the ground of settlement this second application cannot be entertained.
In the result, this application is dismissed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer. He may do so if he is so advised.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE ww/02/11/15