Sarojini Ananthan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5533 of 2015 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 928/2014 OF PUTHENVELIKKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM ------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:
------------------------------------------ SAROJINI ANANTHAN, AGED 71 YEARS, W/O ANANTHAN, VALIYAPARAMBIL VEEDU, PUTHENVELIKKARA, N.PARAVUR, PIN:683594.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR SRI.DILEEP D BHAT RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUTHENVELIKKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN:683594.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ
A. HARIPRASAD, J.
------------------------------ Bail Appl. No.5533 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.928 of 2014 of Puthenvelikkara Police station registered for the offences punishable under Secs.306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application contending that the petitioner's name is mentioned in the suicide note left by the victim.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she is a lady aged 71 years having ailments related to her age.
6. All these matters can be considered at the time when she moves an application for regular bail. It is brought to my notice that this is the third application filed
Bail Appl. No.5533 of 2015 2 under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. On two occasions, this Court turned down the applications submitted by the petitioner. I find no reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
In the result, the bail application is dismissed. Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge