Renjith v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5630 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1208/2015 OF KOIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA. .......
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:
------------------------------------------- RENJITH, S/O.NANDAKUMAR, AGED 31 YEARS, MURALEE BHAVANAM, MALAMBARA, THELLIYOORMURI VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, SRI.ARJUN SREEDHAR.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE:
----------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R. REMA.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
------------------------------------------------ B.A No.5630 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015.
O R D E R
Application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2.
Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1208/2015 of Koipuram Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 332 and 308 r/w Section 149 I.P.C.
3.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the records. 4.
Prosecution case, in short, is that on 28-08-2015 at about 11.15 p.m, the petitioner along with other accused in furtherance of their common object attacked the defacto complainant, who is a Police Officer. Petitioner used a stick (dhandu) to hit the defacto complainant. He warded off the same and sustained an injury on the wrist.
5.
The wound certificate shows that he sustained only minor injuries. Considering the stage of investigation and the
B.A No.5630 of 2015 2 fact that the petitioner was arrested on 28-08-2015, I find that bail can be granted to the petitioner with following strict conditions :
1. The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction.
2. The sureties shall produce documents to establish their identity and solvency. The learned Magistrate need not insist on the solvency certificate, but other documents can also be perused to find out whether the sureties are solvent or not.
3. The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Sundays between 10.00 and 11.00 a.m until final report is filed.
4. The petitioner shall not indulge in any offence while on bail.
5. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses or meddle with the investigation in any manner.
If any of the above conditions is breached by the petitioner, the learned Magistrate is free to cancel bail without referring the matter to this Court.
A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
amk