Abdul Majeed v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5724 of 2015 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1191/2015 OF KOCHI CUSBA POLICE STATION, PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM ...........

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

--------------------------------------

1. ABDUL MAJEED, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.K.MOHAMED NOOH, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.20/1070, NEAR GURUDEVA SERVICE STATION, NAMBIAPURAM ROAD, KOCHI 6, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. SAJITHA, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O.ALAVI, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.20/1070, NEAR GURUDEVA SERVICE STATION, NAMBIAPURAM ROAD, KOCHI 6, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.MADHU SRI.B.S.SURAJ KRISHNA RESPONDENT(S)/STATE:

------------------------------------ THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOCHI CUSBA POLICE STATION, PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.REJI JOSEPH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.

-------------------------------------------------------- B.A.No.5724 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1191/2015 of the Kochi Kasba Police Station. The said crime was registered against the petitioners alleging commission of offence punishable under S.294B, 323, 341, 406, 420 & 498A read with S.34 of Indian Penal Code. 2.

The allegation is that the first petitioner had married the de-facto complainant Smt.Beema Muthu on 08.03.1987 and 2 children were born in the said wedlock. Subsequently, the marital relationship got strained and the same was severed by pronouncing Talaq. Thereafter, the first petitioner married the second petitioner. Aggrieved by the above fact, the former wife has set the law in motion and has got the crime registered.

B.A.No.5724 of 2015 : 2 :

3.

When the mater came up for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the final report has already been laid before court. There is no question of any imminent threat of arrest. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in the said circumstances submitted that he shall approach the trial court and move appropriate application for bail.

In view of the above submission the Bail application is disposed of permitting the petitioner to approach the learned magistrate and to seek regular bail in accordance with law.

Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE.

Bb [True copy] P.A to Judge