← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./5906/2015dismissed

Noushad Haji v. Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-10-07Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 5906 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 96/2015 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT --------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1:

----------------------------------------- NOUSHAD HAJI, S/O.MAMMU HAJI,AGED 32 YEARS, KELOTH HOUSE, NADAPURAM, PERODE.P.O., KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.JOS LEO JOSE RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANTS:

------------------------------------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. PIN-673 504

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- B.A. No.5906 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015

ORDER

Petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.

Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.96 of 2015 of Nadapuram Police Station registered under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 326, 307 and 506(ii) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case is that on 23.01.2015, petitioner along with other accused persons as members of an unlawful assembly attacked the defacto complainant and the petitioner inflicted serious injuries on the defacto complainant by using a sword.

4.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Prosecutor, I am of the view that this is a case wherein the jurisdiction to grant pre-arrest bail shall not be invoked in favour of the petitioner. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is highly essential for proper investigation.

Therefore, the application is dismissed.

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks