← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./6069/2015dismissed

Shivashanmugham v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-25Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 6069 of 2015 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 455/2015 OF MALAMPUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD -------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A-1:

---------------------------------------- SHIVASHANMUGHAM, AGED 43 YEARS, CHIRAKKAD, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

----------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAMPUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678101.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- B.A. No.6069 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2015

ORDER

Application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.455 of 2015 of Malampuzha Police Station registered for an offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code with the allegation that the petitioner, who conducted a chitty, failed to disburse the prize chit money to the subscribers including the defacto complainant. 3.

Heard both sides.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that falsely about 40 cases have been filed against him.

5.

Learned Prosecutor opposed the bail application contending that the petitioner was released on bail in another case, but there is a report by the investigating agency that the petitioner is not complying with the conditions in the bail order and the investigating officer has taken steps to cancel the bail.

BA No.6069/2015 Considering the antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Bail application is dismissed. A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks