← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./6313/2015dismissed

Rakesh @ Kaikkuru v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-14Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 6313 of 2015 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 36/2015 OF NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR ------------------ PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- RAKESH @ KAIKKURU, AGED 30 YEARS, VELAYUDHANKUTTY, AYYAANDI HOUSE, M.G.ROAD, PERINGOTTUKARA, THANYAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.N.L.BITTO RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------ Bail Appl. No.6313 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October 2015

O R D E R

Bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.36 of 2015 of Nedupuzha Police station registered for the offence punishable under Sec.399 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that, on 09.01.2015 at dead of night, the petitioner along with the other accused were found in possession of dangerous weapons like iron pipe, plastic rod, chilly powder etc. in a car. Apparently, their intention was to commit robbery. The petitioner was arrested from the place of detection itself.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in custody from 09.01.2015 and he may be granted bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed

Bail Appl. No.6313 of 2015 2 the bail application contending that the petitioner is involved in 23 cases of very serious nature.

6. I have perused Annexure-1, the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The matter is ripe for trial. I do not find any reason to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage especially reckoning his antecedents. The Trial Court shall expedite the trial and try to finish it within a period of six months from today.

Bail application is dismissed with the above observations.

Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE / True Copy / NS/14/10/2015 P.A. To Judge