Sajeendran v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 6337 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1526/2015 OF PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ...........

APPLICANTS / ACCUSED NOS.3 & 4:

----------------------------------------------------

1. SAJEENDRAN, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, ITTIAMADATHIL HOUSE, P.O.ADAT, ADAT VILLAGE & DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. VIBIN, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.MOHANDAS, THOTTUNGALPARAMBIL HOUSE, AROMAL GARDEN, PURANATTUKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA SMT.VINAYA V.NAIR RESPONDENT/STATE:

-------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ B.A No.6337 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of October, 2015.

O R D E R

Application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 2.

Petitioners are accused Nos.3 and 4 in Crime No.1526/2015 of Peramangalam Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 20(b) ii(A) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 05-09-2015 at about 6.15 p.m., on an information received by the police, they went to the informed place. On seeing the police, the petitioners ran away from the place. First and second accused were arrested from the spot and they were found in possession of ganga. It is

B.A No.6337 of 2015 2 also alleged that the accused persons possessed deadly weapons like sword, iron rod etc.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they are falsely implicated in the case. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application contending that the petitioners' name were revealed at the first instance and they were armed with deadly weapons. 3rd accused is involved in two cases and 4th accused is involved in three other cases. Learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that they are booked under Section 107 Cr.P.C and they are in the rowdy list also. Therefore, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Hence, the bail application is dismissed. Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

//True copy// P.A to Judge amk