← Library
High Court of KeralaCRL.A/756/2003abated

Enforcement Officer,Pf Inspector,Kollam v. Thomas Stephan

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice P.D.Rajan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 CRL.A.No. 756 of 2003 ( ) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ST 81/1999 of C.J.M.,KOLLAM ------------------ APPELLANT(S):

---------------------- ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE PROVIDENT FUND INSPECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL ROAD, KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, PROVIDENT FUND RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. M/s.THOMAS STEPHAN & CO., REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM.

2. V. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, M/S.THOMAS STEPHAN & CO., BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM.

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STK

P.D. RAJAN, J.

------------------------------- C.R.A.No.756 of 2003 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the order in S.T.81/99 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kollam by the Enforcement Officer, Office of the Provident Fund Inspector, Kollam. The accused in the above case was acquitted by the learned Magistrate under Section 256(1) Cr.P.C. On 6.8.02, the appellant was absent. Hence, the accused were acquitted by the trial court. After filing this appeal, several directions were issued by this court to take steps against the respondents. After the issuance of notice, it is informed that the first respondent company was liquidated and the second respondent is no more. In this circumstance, since the company is non est and accused is no more, this appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- P.D. RAJAN, STK JUDGE //TRUE C OPY// P.A. TO JUDGE