Sandeep v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937Q Bail Appl..No. 6571 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 572/2015 OF PEECHI POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 :
------------------------------------------------
1. SANDEEP, S/O. ANTAVAN, AGED 29 THARAYIL HOUSE, MARAR ROAD DESOM KANNARA PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DIST.
2. VINEESH, S/O. VIJAYAN, AGED 29, THENGINGAL HOUSE, MARAR ROAD DESOM KANNARA PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DIST.
3. RAMESH @ KARUMADI RAMESH, AGED 26, S/O. RAMASUNDARAM @ MANI, VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE UDAYAPURAM COLONY, KANNARA, PEECHI THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.E.VIJIN KARTHIK SRI.P.V.JEEVESH RESPONDENT/STATE :
---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO. 572/2015 OF PEECH POLICE STATION) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
-------------------------------------- B.A. No.6571 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015
ORDER
Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2.
Petitioners are accused in Crime No.572 of 2015 of Peechi Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 324, 326 and 308 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They are booked for allegedly attacking the defacto complainant on 22.04.2015 at 9.00 p.m. by using a sword and other weapons.
3.
Heard both sides.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were arrested on 06.10.2015.
5.
Learned Prosecutor opposed the bail application. She contended that the first accused is involved in two other offences of identical nature and he is also involved in a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further, he was convicted under the provisions of the Arms Act. Second accused was also a previous convict under the Arms Act. Third accused was also involved in two other crimes of
BA No.6571/2015 same nature and also in a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Considering the nature of offences, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Bail application is dismissed. Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.
//True copy// P.S to Judge cks