← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./6619/2015dismissed

Latheef M.V. v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-27Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/5TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 6619 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 249/2013 OF PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, KANNUR ------------------ PETITIONER/ACCUSED :

------------------------------------ LATHEEF M.V., S/O. AHAMMAD, AGED 40 YEARS MADANVALLIYODE VEEDU, PERUYARAM AMSOM KORAMPEDIKA.

BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT :

-----------------------------------------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM-682 031.

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PARIYARAM MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION KANNUR DISTRICT-670502.

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C. RASHEED THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------ Bail Appl. No.6619 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October 2015

O R D E R

Bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.249 of 2013 of Pariyaram Medical College Police station registered for the offence punishable under Sec.15(1)(a) read with Sec.15(4) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. The case is now pending as C.C. No.367 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application contending that the petitioner is involved in 18 other cases. Subsequent to the passing of the prohibitory order under the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, he has involved in eight other cases. It is also alleged that the petitioner violated the

Bail Appl. No.6619 of 2015 2 prohibitory orders and entered the District and committed the offences thereafter.

5. Considering the antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to him. In the result, the bail application is dismissed. Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE / True Copy / NS/27/10/2015 P.A. To Judge