P. P. Jalaludheen v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/13TH KARTHIKA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 6721 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1639/2015 OF CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT ----------- PETITIONER :
--------------------- P. P. JALALUDHEEN, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.POKUNJU, NOW RESIDING AT PJ COTTAGE, VADAKKEVILA P.O, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SMT.K.K.JYOTHILAKSHMY SRI.SANIL JOSE SRI.EBIN MATHEW RESPONDENT :
------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM -682 031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA.T.Y.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
A. HARIPRASAD, J --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of November, 2015
O R D E R
Bail application filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is an accused in Crime no. 1639 of of Cantonment Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, for the offences punishable under Secs.420 and 406 IPC.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4.
The office bearers of a co-operative Society extended a promise to the de facto complainant that if the latter deposited some amount in the Society, the Society would provide a financial assistance for buying a Car and running it as rent a Car.
5.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the petitioner took charge of the Society as Chairman on 15/07/2015. The alleged irregularities happened much before his assumption of office. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides, I am of the view that no custodial interrogation is necessary in this case. The following directions are issued:
1. The petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within a period of two weeks and submit himself/themselves for interrogation.
2. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.
3. The petitioner shall appear before
the Investigating Officer as and when directed and co-operate with the investigation.
4. The petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall he tamper with the evidence.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this Court.
Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE bpr