Sankan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2015/8TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 6994 of 2014 ----------------------------------- CRIME NO.1096/2014 OF KARUNAGAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM .........
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
--------------------------------------------------
1. SANKAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. SUGUNANANDAN, THAIKOOTTATHIL VEEDU, KUZHITHURA, ALAPPADU VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM.
2. SAJI, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. SATHEESAN, THUPPASSERIL VEEDU, VELLANATHURUTH, CHERIYAZHEEKAL P.O., ALAPPADU, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRA KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S)/STATE:
------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031, (CRIME NO. 1096/2014 OF KARUNAGAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.)
2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARUNAGAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM - 690 518, (CRIME NO. 1096/2014 OF KARUNGAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SURESH N.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, J.
============================== ============================== Dated this the 29th day of May, 2015
ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3.
The petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.1096 of 2014 of Karunagappally Police Station. The offences alleged are under Sections 323 and 294(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent of the allegations raised against them. They have no criminal antecedents. The investigation of the case is almost over. The custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required in this
case. He further submits that the petitioners apprehend arrest by the police at any time.
4.
Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the investigation of the case is almost over. He further submits that no criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioners. All the offences, except the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleged against the petitioners are bailable. In the circumstances, it is open to the petitioners to surrender before the Jurisdictional Magistrate and seek regular bail as held by this Court in Shanu v. State of Kerala [2000
(3) KLT 452] and subsequent decisions.
5.
Therefore, this bail application is disposed of as under:
The petitioners shall surrender before the Jurisdictional Magistrate within two weeks from today and seek regular bail with intimation to the Assistant Public Prosecutor concerned atleast three working days in
advance. In case, such application is preferred by the petitioners, the learned Magistrate shall pass appropriate orders on the application in the light of the decision in Shanu v. State of Kerala (Supra) and subsequent decisions of this Court as early as possible. This Bail Application is disposed of as above. Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE rkj //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE