Ratheesh P.M. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 7263 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 368/2015 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ------------- PETITIONER/1ST AND 2ND ACCUSED :
---------------------------------------------------------- RATHEESH P.M., AGED 30 YEARS, SON OF RAGHAVAN, PAAYYOOR MANGATT HOUSE, THRITHALA, MEZHATHOOR P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KISHOR B.
RESPONDENT :
--------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. T.Y.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
A.HARIPRASAD, J.
-------------------------------------- B.A. No. 7263 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015
ORDER
Petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.
Petitioner is the third accused in Crime No.368 of 2015 of Perinthalmanna Police Station registered for offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 r/w Section 34 I.P.C. 3.
Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner and other accused failed to repay the chit amount subscribed by the defacto complainant.
4.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5.
Considering the nature of allegations, I find that pre-arrest bail can be granted to the petitioner with following directions :
1. Petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within a period of two weeks from today and submit himself for interrogation. In that event, the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the
B.A. No. 7263 of 2015 2 like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
2.
The sureties shall produce documents to establish their identity and solvency. The Investigating Officer need not insist on the solvency certificate, but other documents can also be perused to find out whether the sureties are solvent or not.
3. Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed.
4.
Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate witnesses.
5. If any of the above conditions is violated by the petitioner, the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction is free to cancel the bail.
Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE //True copy// P.A to Judge amk