← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./7337/2015allowed

Sambu S.B v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-26Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 7337 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1728/2015 OF FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ------------------- APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO.1 :

------------------------------------------- SAMBU S.B., AGED 27 YEARS S/O.BHUVANACHANDRAN, SREESHYLAM, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.V.C.SARATH RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :

------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of November, 2015

O R D E R

Application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.1728 of 2015 of Fort Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 294(b), 324 & 354 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Prosecution case is that on 09.08.2015 the defacto complainant came in an autorickshaw and attempted to park it. At that time his wife was also present. The accused persons were consuming liquor at that place. The accused persons intercepted the vehicle and dragged out the defacto complainant and assaulted him. They attacked the wife of the defacto complainant as well.

4.

Heard both sides.

5.

Considering the nature of the allegations, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is

necessary. Hence, the following directions are issued: (a) The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within a period of 'two weeks' from today and submit himself for interrogation. Thereafter, he shall be released on bail on executing a bond for `25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

(b) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of interrogation.

(c) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation of the case.

(d) The petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

(e) The petitioner shall not in any manner interfere or meddle with the investigation.

(f) The petitioner shall not, during the period

of this bail get involved in any offence.

In case any of the above conditions is violated, bail granted hereby is liable to be cancelled for which the investigating officer may move application before the jurisdictional magistrate.

Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

AS /True Copy/ P.A. To Judge