← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./7373/2014dismissed

T.R. Ajith Kumar v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 7373 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 2260/2013 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION , PATHANAMTHITTA ----------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:

-------------------------------------------

1. T.R. AJITH KUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS, THATTANAPPALLY, PERINGHADU P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

2. A.V.ANU, AGED 30 YEARS, ALINTETHEKKETHIL, MELOODU P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

3. K.MADHAVAN UNNITHAN, AGED 79 YEARS, THULASI VILASOM, KARUVATTA, ADOOR P.O.

4. MUKESH GOPINATH, AGED 31 YEARS, VIRANICKAL HOUSE, MALAKKARA, ADOOR P.O.

PATHANAMTHITTA.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.HARIDAS SRI.P.C.SHIJIN RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA- 682031.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADOOR POLICE STATION-682031.

* ADDL.R3 & R4 IMPLEADED

3. HARIKUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.VASUDEVAN PILLAI, VAZHAPPALLI, CHOORAKKATU, ERATHU VILLAGE, ADOOR.

PJ ....2/-

..2..

Bail Appl..No. 7373 of 2014 ----------------------------------------

4. VIJAYAKUMAR.K., AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN NAIR, CHIRAKKAROTTU VEEDU, MALAMEKKARA, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. ADDL.R3 & R4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.16/10/14 IN CRL.MA.9622/2014 IN BA.7373/2014.

R1 & 2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.SAREENA GEORGE R3& 4 BY ADV. SRI.SERGI JOSEPH THOMAS THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.7373 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

O R D E R

The learned counsel submits that the application is not pressed. He prays that the petitioners may be granted liberty to file a fresh application. They may file application if any subsequent developments takes place.

In the result, this application is dismissed with the above observation.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge