High Court of KeralaBail Appl./7558/2015disposed of

Vimal v. Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-12-10Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 7558 of 2015 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 950/2015 OF IRITTY POLICE STATION, KANNUR ........

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- VIMAL, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O VIJAYAN, KARAT (H), VELLARAVALLY AMSOM KUNITHLA DESOM, PERAVOOR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.CIBI THOMAS SMT.ASHA SUNDARAM RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT/STATE:

----------------------------------------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IRITTY POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 001.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R.REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: MSV/

A.HARIPRASAD, J --------------------------------------- Bail Appl. No.7558 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2015

ORDER

Bail application filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioner is the accused in crime no. 950/2015 of Iritty Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 450 and 376 of IPC.

3. The prosecution case in short is that the de facto complainant is a widow aged 53 years. The accused proposed her and made her believe that he earnestly intended to marry her. Thereafter, they had sexual relationship. Later it was revealed that he was cheating the de facto complainant.

4. Heard both sides.

5. Considering the nature of allegations, I am inclined to pass the following order:

The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within a period of '15 days' from today and submit himself for interrogation. The Investigating Officer shall produce him before the

Bail Appl. No.7558 of 2015 learned Magistrate having jurisdiction on the date of surrender itself. Thereafter, the petitioner is free to move for bail before the learned Magistrate and in that event, the learned Magistrate may consider the application on merits, if possible on the date of surrender itself.

Sd/- A.HARIPRASAD JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE AD