← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./7571/2015allowed

Reneesh Narayan v. Si Of Police, Iritty Police Station

2015-12-07Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 7571 of 2015 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1502/2015 OF IRITTY POLICE STATION, KANNUR --------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3:

-----------------------------------------------------

1. RENEESH NARAYAN, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, THEKKAN OTHAYOTH, IRITTY AGRICULTURAL MARKETING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, PAYAM P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT.

2. JITESH NAROTH, S/O.RAJAN, P.O PAYAM, KANNUR DISTRICT.

3. PRAKASHAN C.K, S/O.KESAVAN, CHIRAGEL, PAYAM P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.CIBI THOMAS SMT.ASHA SUNDARAM RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT/STATE:

----------------------------------------------------------

1. SI OF POLICE, IRITTY POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

----------------------------- Bail Appl. No.7571 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December 2015

O R D E R

Bail application filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioners are accused nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.1502 of 2015 of Iritty Police station registered for the offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 447, 452, 324, 506(i) and 427 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that, on 04.11.2015 at 9.00 p.m., the petitioner along with other accused, as members of an unlawful assembly, armed with weapons, criminally trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and assaulted him with hands and sword.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Considering the nature of allegations, I am of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary. Hence following directions are issued.

1. The petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer within a period of two

Bail Appl. No.7591 of 2015 2 weeks and submit themselves for interrogation.

2. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

3. The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when directed by him in writing.

4. The petitioners shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall they tamper with the evidence.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this Court.

Sd/- A. HARIPRASAD JUDGE / True Copy / NS/07/12/2015 P.A. To Judge