Suresh Kumar v. Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 7899 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 733/2014 OF WALAYAR POLICE STATION , PALAKKAD DISTRICT --------------- PETITIONER(S)/2ND & 3RD ACCUSED :

----------------------------------------------------------

1. SURESH KUMAR, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.M.K.NAIR, KRISHNA NIVAS, S.VAZHAKULAM, MARAMBILLY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM.

2. S.VIMAL KUMAR, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.SURESH KUMAR, KRISHNA NIVAS, S.VAZHAKULAM, MARAMBILLY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.SREEVALSAN.V SMT.M.K.SHIMI SRI.D.SREENATH RESPONDENT(S) :

---------------------------- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WALAYAR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R.REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

==================== B.A.No. 7899 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioners have allegedly committed the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC. The prosecution case is that they used the TIN number allotted to another person under the Sales Tax Act and thereby committed the offences mentioned above.

3. Heard.

4. The petitioners have no case that they were allotted any number by the Sales Tax Authorities. So, prima facie they have committed the offences alleged against them. This is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail.

In the result, this application is dismissed. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge