← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./8393/2013dismissed

Suneesh Kumar. V v. Sub Inspector Of Police

2013-12-24Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/3RD POUSHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 8393 of 2013 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO.897/2013 OF PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------- SUNEESH KUMAR. V, AGED 37 YEARS S/O.VISWAMBHARAN, ASWATHY VEEDU, COURT ROAD ALUVA P.O., ALUVA COLLEGE.

BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUMBAVOOR, PIN - 683 542.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA T.Y.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No.8393 of 2013 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of December, 2013

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

According to the petitioner, he is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.897/2013 of Perumbavur Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 463, 465 and 467 read with Section 34 IPC. 3.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that till now the petitioner has not been arraigned as an accused in the crime. His presence for investigation was required and, therefore, he was summoned to the police station and his specimen signature and thump impression were taken. Only after an analysis, the police can take a decision as to whether he should be made an accused or not. As things stand now, according to

BA.8393/2013 : 2 :

the learned Public Prosecutor, the police does not intend to place the petitioner under arrest.

4.

In the result, this Bail Application is dismissed with a direction to the investigating officer to give an opportunity to the petitioner to approach this Court once again, in case the police require the arrest of the petitioner. Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/24/12 // True Copy // PA to Judge