Sajan v. State Of Kerala,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/22ND POUSHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 8856 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1224/2014 OF THALIPARAMBA POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
------------------------------------ SAJAN K.V., S/O.SYAMALA, AGED 23 KALLEMVALLI, MAVICHERRY PAYYANNOOR P.O., KANNUR DIST.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.M.NAZAR SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.
SMT.M.V.ASHA BINDU RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE :
-------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING S.H.O., THALIPPARAMPA P.S., KANNUR DIST.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SREEJITH V.S.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-01-2015, ALONG WITH BA. 8866/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of January, 2015
O R D E R
Petitions filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
The petitioners apprehend that they will be arrested by the police in connection with crime No.1224/2014 of Thaliparamba Police Station, which has been registered for the offence under Section 436 IPC.
2.
The allegation is that the first and second accused set fire to a car owned by the defacto complainant, who is the brother-in-law of the second accused. The incident happened at 11 p.m. on 21.9.2014. The petitioners have not been arraigned as accused so far. But they apprehend that they will be arrested by the police. So they pray for anticipatory bail.
3.
Heard.
4.
The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners had contacted the accused in this case just before and after the incident and it is highly necessary to
-2interrogate them and for their effective interrogation their custody is necessary.
5.
If the police want to interrogate them with regard to the suspicious circumstances appropriate condition can be made in the bail order and if it is revealed that they are really involved in the incident, the Investigating Officer may apply for cancellation of the bail.
In the result, these bail applications are allowed. 1) The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if they are arrested by the police in connection with this case.
2) The Investigating Officer may direct them to appear before him on any days, if their further interrogation is necessary.
3) They shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.
-34) They shall co-operate with the investigation. 5) They shall not commit any offence while they are on bail.
This order is not applicable if the petitioners choose to surrender before the Magistrate concerned and in such case the learned Magistrate may take appropriate action in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/