Sajil v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936 Bail Appl.No. 9163 of 2014 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 127/2014 OF THIRUPURAM EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, THIRUVANANDAPURAM ........

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- SAJIL, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SADANANDAN, ROADARIKATH VEEDU, VARUVILAKOM, EDAKONAM, NEAR THEMBAMUTTOM BRIDGE, THEMBAMUTTOM JUNCTION, THALAYAL DESOM, ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA T.Y.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

................................................................ B.A. No.9163 of 2014 ............................................................... Dated this the 7th day of January, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.127/2014 of the Thirupuram Excise Range registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act. 3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 14.12.2014 at 1 p.m., he was found in possession of 2.500 litres of coloured arrack, in contravention of the provisions of the Abkari Act. The petitioner was arrested on 14.12.2014 and thereafter he has been in custody.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition. Perused the CD.

B.A.No.9163 of 2014 -: 2 :- 5.

The contents of the CD, prima facie, reveal the complicity of the petitioner. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. The investigation of this case is practically over. Continued detention of the petitioner in custody is not required for the continued investigation of this case. Having regard to the period undergone by the petitioner in custody, the present stage of investigation and the absence of any criminal antecedents on his part, I am of the view that the petitioner can be enlarged on bail. 6.

In the result, this Bail Application is allowed and the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for `1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, and subject to the following terms and conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer in between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays and Saturdays commencing from 14.01.2015 for a period of

B.A.No.9163 of 2014 -: 3 :- three months or till the filing of the final report in this case, whichever is earlier.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence while on bail.

It is made clear that the violation of any of the conditions stipulated above will result in the cancellation of bail.

Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE ul/- [True copy] P.S. to Judge