A.Mohanan v. Antony Chacko, M.D. Ksrtc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/30TH POUSHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 63 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------- WP(C) 23232/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA ---------------- PETITIONERS :

-------------------

1. A.MOHANAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. ARU, CHAMBAKULAM HOUSE, VADAVANNOORE P.O. PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRSENTLY WORKING AS PROVISIONAL DRIVER KSRTC DEPOT PALAKKAD UNDER THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC PALAKKAD.

2. K. KUPPUNNY, S/O. MAYAPPAN, EKKODE HOUSE, PERIMKUNNAM P.O. P.O. KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PRESENTLY WORKING AS EMPANELLED DRIVER, KSRTC DEPOT PALAKKAD UNDER THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH(ROY) RESPONDENT :

-------------------- ANTONY CHACKO, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. CHACKO, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 039. BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

Con.Case(C).No. 63 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN DT 7/1/2014 IN WPC NO. 23232/2014(D) OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SHOWING THE RECIPT OF ANNEXURE I ON 23/10/2014.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- Cont. Case (c) No. 63 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

Earlier, this Court, through a judgment dated 07.10.2014 in W.P. (C) No. 23232/2014, directed the respondent Corporation to regularize the service of the petitioners forthwith in terms of Exhibit P12 therein. Complaining of non-compliance of the said direction by the respondent Corporation, the petitioners filed the present contempt case.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation has produced what are said to be the proceedings dated 05.01.2015 passed by the Corporation regularizing the service of the petitioners in compliance with judgment dated 07.10.2014 in W.P. (C) No. 23232/2014.

Cont. Case (c) No. 63 of 2015

3. In the facts and circumstances, since the order of this Court stands complied with, belatedly though, this Court feels that nothing survives in the contempt case and accordingly closes it.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-