V S Shanavas v. K Ramachandran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/21ST MAGHA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 73 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21189/2012 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 24-10-2013 ---------------------- PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C) :
---------------------------------------------------- V.S. SHANAVAS, AGED 38 YEARS S/O.LATE SULAIMAN, GENERAL SECRETARY ANTI CORRUPTION MOVEMENT, KERALA, GROUND FLOOR THANKAM BUILDING, WEST YAKKARA, PALAKKAD (DT) BY ADV. SRI.SURAJ S.
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN WP(C) :
----------------------------------------------------------------- K. RAMACHANDRAN AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOTR, PALAKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, COLLECTORATE P.O., PALAKKAD-678001 BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.P. MADHAVANKUTTY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
Con.Case(C).No. 73 of 2015 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C) NO. 21189/2012 DATED 24.10.2013.
ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.12.2013.
ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE REMIDER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 23.10.2014 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn
ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.C.J.
& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
------------------------------------------------ Contempt Case (C) NO.73 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, Ag.C.J.
This contempt application has been filed seeking compliance of the judgment dated 24.10.2013 in W.P.(C) No.21189 of 2012. The Division Bench, by the above judgment, directed the 4th Respondent-District Collector to complete the proceedings in the appeal pending before him as early as possible but not later than six months from that date.
2. The learned Government Pleader made a statement that the appeal has already been decided on 5th February, 2015. As the appeal has already been decided, we see no ground to proceed with this contempt proceedings.
The Contempt Case is accordingly closed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.
Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
st/-