High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/172/2015closed

K.P.Babuji v. Arun Rangan

2015-03-11Honourable Mr.Justice P.N.Ravindran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 172 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).1848/2014 ---------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 1848/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 8.7.2014 PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:

--------------------------------------------------

1. K.P.BABUJI KALARICKALVELI, S.N.PURAM, CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA (RETIRED SANITATION WORKER ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY).

2. T.P.JACOB THUNDU PARAMBIL, BEACH WARD, THIRUVAMBADY P.O. ALAPPUZHA, (RETIRED SANITATION WORKER ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY)

3. P.PONNAPPAN MACHUNKALVEEDU, MANNANCHERY P.O.

ALAPPUZHA (RETIRED SANITATION WORKER ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY).

BY ADV. SRI.C.A.RAJEEV RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

-------------------------------------------------- ARUN RANGAN AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ALAPPUZHA - 686 001.

BY ADV. SRI.AZAD BABU, SC, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 172 of 2015 ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE I: JUDGMENT DATED 08/07/14 IN WPC 1848/2014 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ VPS PS TO JUDGE

P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

--------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No.172 of 2015 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent herein, the Secretary, Alappuzha Municipality, has wilfully disobeyed Annexure-I judgment delivered by this Court on 8.7.2014 in W.P.(C) No.1848 of 2014.

2. When the contempt case came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the terminal benefits have been disbursed to them. In such circumstances, I find no grounds to entertain the contempt case. It is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps