Sreedevi V.R. v. Dr.Asha Thomas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 Con.Case(C).No. 179 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- ARISING FROM JUDGMENT DATED 23-09-2014 IN WP(C) 30735/2009 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS:
--------------------
1. SREEDEVI V.R.
W/O. MOHANKUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS, STENO TYPIST KERALA STATE BACKWARD CLASSES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM.
2. SOFIYA .A.
W/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED 46, STENO TYPIST KERALA STATE BACKWARD CLASSES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN SRI.P.E.SAJAL SRI.E.S.ASHRAF SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.K.
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. DR. ASHA THOMAS (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SC/ST DEVELOPMENT (F) CORPORATION, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. B. DILEEP KUMAR, MANAGING DIRECTOR FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) KERALA STATE BACK WARD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD PATTUR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035.
R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.V. ELIAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.JAYAPRADEEP. V, SC, KSBCDC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con. Case (c) No.179/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS ANNEXURE-A1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC No.30735/2009. ANNEXURE-A2TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21-10-2014 ANNEXURE-A3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17-11-2014.
ANNEXURE-A4TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 31-01-2015. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL True copy P.A. To Judge
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
------------------------------------------------- Con. Case (c) No. 179 OF 2015 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF MARCH, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
Counsel for the 2nd respondent had produced copy of an interim order issued by the Division Bench in W.A No.292/2015, granting interim stay against the directions contained in Annxure-A1 judgment.
2.
In the light of pendency of the writ appeal and the interim order granted by the Division Bench, this contempt of court case is hereby closed, subject to liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners to move afresh if circumstances warrants.
Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE True copy P.A. to Judge