Alice v. Solaman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 185 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).12519/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12519/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-01-2015 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- ALICE, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.VARGHESE, MAPRANATHUKARAN HOUSE, KALLUR P.O., THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3 IN W.P. (C) : - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. SOLOMON, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, THRIKKUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRKKUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 732.
2. ROSILY, (AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), W/O.FRANICS, KAVIL HOUSE, KALLOOR, THRIKKUR P.O., THISSUR-680 732.
ADLL.R3 IMPLEADED ADDL.R3. M.J. JIJO, PRINCIPAL SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHUKKADU POLICE STATION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 312.
(ADDITIONAL R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 30.03.15 IN IA.143/2015). R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) R1 BY ADV. SMT.R.RAJITHA R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.D.SREEVISAKH R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.SURESH R2 BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER (THURAVOOR) R2 BY ADV. SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.HARISH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 185 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).12519/2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE I :
CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 06.01.2015 IN W.P. (C) No. 12519 OF 2014.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R1(a) :
COPY OF LETTER DATED 03.02.15 ISSUED TO S.I. OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION.
EXHIBIT R1(b):
TRUE TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT R1(a).
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
--------------------------------------- Cont. case (c) No. 185 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Contempt Case has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-