S.Vrinda v. Mr. C.V.Nandan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/25TH JYAISHTA, 1937 CON.CASE(C).NO. 195 OF 2015 (S) IN WP(C).19103/2010 ----------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
------------------------- S.VRINDA AGED 50 YEARS W/O M.P.BINU, ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL DIVISION MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT (PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TRANSMISSION CIRCLE, H.M.T. COLONY P.O., KALAMASSERY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT).
BY ADVS.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN SRI.N.MANU THAMPI RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
--------------------------- MR. C.V.NANDAN,AGED 54 YEARS (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJU JOSEPH (SR.) R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.T.PAULOSE, SC, KSEB BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C).NO. 195 OF 2015 (S) IN WP(C).19103/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE 1:CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.10.2014 IN W.P. (C).NO.19103/2010 ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE SUB POSTMASTER, H.M.T COLONY DATED 4.12.2014 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
............................................................. Contempt Case.(C).No.195 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 15th day of June, 2015 J U D G M E N T It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that, in view of the fact that, the respondent Board has preferred an appeal against the judgment dated 30.10.2014 in W.P.(C).No.19103 of 2010 and the matter is pending consideration before the Division Bench, he does not wish to pursue the contempt of court case for the moment. Recording the submission of counsel for the petitioner, the contempt of court case is closed.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns