High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/255/2015closed

Sarada A.C. v. Sri.Gopalakrishna Bhat

2015-07-17Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2015/26TH ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 255 of 2015 () IN WP(C).8830/2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8830/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 02-11-2010 PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SARADA A.C. AGED 65 YEARS W/O.LATE GANGADHARA MARAR C, RESIDING AT PRASADAM PANANGAD P.O, BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. SRI.GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. DR.GIRISH CHOLAYIL THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE.

3. GIRIJA THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THAMARASSERY KOZHIKODE.

R1 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 255 of 2015 () IN WP(C).8830/2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE DPI DATED 15.10.2008 ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.8830 OF 2010 DATED 02.11.2010 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------ ANNEXURE R1(a) COPY OF THE LETTER NO.GE/29/A/13713 DATED 12.04.2012. // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== Cont. Case (C). No. 255 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 17th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the directions in Annexure A2 judgment dated 02.011.2010 have been subsequently complied with by the respondents and therefore, the Contempt of Court Case can be closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to approach an appropriate forum for agitating any susbsisting grievance.

Accordingly, the Contempt of Court case is closed, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for agitating any subsisting grievance. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das