Anil Kumar S v. Vijayakumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 303 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT DATED 16-10-2014 IN WP(C) 8775/2013 ......

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:

------------------------------------------------------------ ANIL KUMAR S., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O SIVARAMAN, PUTHEN VEEDU, VAIDYASALA NAGAR-376, ASRAMAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 IN THE WPC: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TALUK SURVEYOR, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691 001.

2. SRI. VIPIN LUKE, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TALUK SURVEYOR, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLLAM-691 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RENJITH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

msv/

Con.Case(C).No. 303 of 2015 (S) --------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.2.11.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE A2: THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.16.10.2014 IN WP(C) NO.8775/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD.11.11.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND ITS RECEIPT NO.62724/14/C3 DTD.11.11.2014.

ANNEXURE A4: THE TRUE REMINDER NOTICE DTD.24.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH HIS COUNSEL AND ITS POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DTD.28.1.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* Contempt Case(C) No.303 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 27th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the respondents that directions in the judgment have been complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln /True copy/ P.A. to Judge