Roy Mathew v. Apm Mohammed Hanish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/8TH ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 366 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C).NO.17939/2014 DATED 24/11/2014) --------------- PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------------- ROY MATHEW, AGED 50 YEARS,S/O.MATHEW, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, PAMPLANIYIL HOUSE, BHARANANGANAM P.O., PALA-VIA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.P.T.ABHILASH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------------------------------
1. APM MOHAMMED HANISH, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -695 001.
2. P.P.BENNY, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS & BRIDGES), CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN -683 101.
3. HASSAN, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIS WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROAD & BRIDGES DIVISION), THRISSUR-680 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ABHIJETT LESSLI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.366/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24/11/2014 IN WP(C).NO.17939/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ANNEX B COPY OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT DATED 28/11/2014 ANNEX C COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.A2-3389/92 DATED 20/12/2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEX D COPY OF THE BILL DATED 20/12/2014 FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1/9/2014 TO 30/9/2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------ Cont.Case (C) No.366 of 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by both the counsel that, the direction of this Court has already been complied with.
In view of the above, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
AV