K.R.Narayanan v. Babu S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/9TH ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 390 of 2015 (S) IN WA.1476/2007 ------------------------------------------------- ORDER IN RP 775/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-12-2013 --------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER :- ---------------------------- K.R.NARAYANAN PROPRIETOR, M/S.K.R.HOSPITAL, PALACE ROAD ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT :- --------------------------- BABU S., AGED 50 YEARS SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, ALAMKODE BRANCH ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 102.

BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

Con.Case(C).No. 390 of 2015 (S) IN WA.1476/2007 ------------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- -------------------------- ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO. 1476 OF 2007. ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN R.P.NO. 775 OF 2013 IN WA.NO. 1476 OF 2007.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.390 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

This contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 16.12.2013 in R.P.No.775 of 2013 in W.A.No.1476 of 2007. In the review petition, this Court observed that if the petitioner had paid the entire amount due to the bank, the bank will certify that he is not a defaulter. It is stated that there was no communication from the bank regarding the same.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank on instructions would submit that a communication stating that the petitioner is not a defaulter had already been communicated as per letter dated 29.4.2014. A copy of the said letter has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner as well. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we do not find any case of contempt. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt