High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/452/2015closed

P.R.Mohan v. Najuma

2015-06-01Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 452 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 2272/2014 DATED 28-08-2014) -------------- PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER :

-------------------------------------------------- P.R.MOHAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.(LATE). P. NARAYANA PANIKKAR, 'PARAPPIL' HOUSE, KUNNAKKAL (P.O), VALAKAM, MUVATTUPUZHA 682 316 BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 :

------------------------------------------------------ NAJUMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME (NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) TALUK SURVEYOR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN -682 011 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.T.SHEEBA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

COC.NO.452/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEX A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.2272/2014 DATED 28/08/2014 ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.MC 478/11/D ISSUED BY REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM DATED 02/04/2013 WHICH IS MARKED AS EXT.P2 IN WP(C).NO.2272/2014 ANNEX A3 COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.S1-17022/14 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. ANNEX A4 COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.S1-17022/14 ISSUED BY ADDL.TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR DATED 11/02/2015.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- Contempt Case (C). No. 452 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, the directions have already been complied with.

Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is hereby closed. If the petitioner approaches the respondent for sketch of the property, if any, drawn based on the inspection conducted by the respondent, the same shall be given to the petitioner based on any fee to be charged.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE Pn