Ajith R. v. Padmakumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 473 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).17238/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17238/2014N DATED 20-10-2014 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1 & 3 IN WP(C):

------------------------------------------------

1. AJITH R. AGED 45 YEARS S/O.RAVINDRAN, TC 29/405-1, THENGAPURA LANE PETTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2. DR.ANILKUMAR AGED 48 YEARS S/O.SUJA SUMAN, AVRA -7, AKSHARAVEEDHI ROAD PETTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPOSNDENT IN WP(C):

------------------------------------------- PADMAKUMAR FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETRY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION PO. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 001.

R BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVM CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JJ

K. SURENDRA MOHAN , J.

------------------------------- Cont.Case NO.473 OF 2015 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 13th July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the respondent submits that, a decision has already been taken by the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation to issue a building permit to the petitioners. However, the permit has not yet been issued for the reason that the petitioners have not paid the permit fees and produced the other documents that are necessary to be produced. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the permit fees would be paid and all necessary documents would be produced. In view of the above this contempt case is closed recording the above submission.

SD/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj /True copy/