Laila T.M. v. Dr.P.K.Jameela
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 554 of 2015 (S) IN WA.2005/2010 ------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN WA 2005/2010 DATED 11.4.2014 ----------------- PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANTS No.1, 3, 2, 4 & 6 :- ----------------------------------------------
1. LAILA T.M., AGED 57 YEARS, W/O.MOHAMMED LEPROSY INSPECTOR, P.H.C. PUDUPPARIYARAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT, RESIDING AT VAZHAPARAMBIL HOUSE SAKTHI NAGAR, MANTHAKKAD, PALAKKAD.
2. PADMINI V., AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.M.BALAKRISHNAN LEPROSY INSPECTOR, P.H.C. POKOTTUKAVU PALAKKAD DISTRICT, RESIDING AT MUNTHAPPARA HOUSE MANGALAMKUNNU, P.O.KATTUKULAM VIA.THIRUVAZHIYODE, PALAKKAD.
3. ABDUL RAHMAN E., AGED 56 YEARS S/O.HAMZA (LATE), LEPROSY INSPECTOR P.H.C. SREEKRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT RESIDING AT EDAKKURUSSI, UMMANAZHI P.O. PALAPPATTA PALAKKAD
4. P.SIVANARAYANAN AGED 53 YEARS S/O.LATE K.M.KRISHNAN NAIR, LEPROSY INSPECTOR P.H.C. THRIKKADEERI, PALAKKAD RESIDING AT 6/369 SABARI NIVAS, MANALMANTHA AMBIKAPURAM, PALAKKAD - 678011
5. K.V. SARASWATHY, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.RAMACHANDRAN LEPROSY INSPECTOR, P.H.C. KOGHAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT RESIDING AT CHOLAYIL HOUSE MUTHAKURRISSI P.O. THACHAMPARA VIA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.2 :- ---------------------------------- DR.P.K.JAMEELA FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.GIRIJA GOPAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
jvt
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
---------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.554 of 2015 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of July 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ This contempt case has been filed alleging non-compliance of the directions issued in the judgment dated 11.4.2014 in W.A.No. 2005 of 2010. The Division Bench, by paragraphs 18 and 19 has issued the said direction.
2.
Learned Special Government Pleader has placed before the court an order dated 13.7.2015 issued by the Director of Health Services, Thiruvananthapuram, wherein an order has been issued in compliance with the Division Bench judgment. The State has already filed a Special Leave Petition (C) No.20112 of 2015 against the Division Bench judgment, which is said to be pending. It is also submitted that subject to the judgment of the Apex Court, an order has already been issued in compliance with the Division Bench judgment. In the above view of the matter, we see no reason to proceed with the contempt proceedings. Recording the
Cont. Case (C) No.554 of 2015 -: 2 :- submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Jvt