High Court of KeralaCon.Case(C)/558/2015closed

P.Venugopalan Nair v. Antony Chacko

2015-07-29Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 558 of 2015 IN W.P.(C.).2396/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C.) NO. 2396/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29-01-2015 ................................................. PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN THE W.P.(C):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. P.VENUGOPALAN NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS S/O. PRABHAKARAN NAIR, (SUPERINTENDENT, KSRTC PALODE (NEDUMANGADU) DEPOT, RETIRED ON 30.11.2012) MALAVIKA, CHIPPANCHIRA, KARIMAMCODE P.O.

PALODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2. C.VIJAYAN PILLAI AGED 58 YEARS S/O.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, (CHARGEMAN, KSRTC NEDUMANGADU (VITHURA), RETIRED ON 31.10.2012) ANJU BHAVAN, CHENNANPARA, VITHURA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.(C):

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONY CHACKO (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS) MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695 023 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Con.Case(C).No. 558 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :- ----------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1.

JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO. 2396 OF 2015 DATED 29.01.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:-NIL --------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 558 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Annexure R1(a) memorandum is issued purportedly in compliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. The petitioner is free to challenge Annexure R1(a) memorandum appropriately.

The contempt of court case proceedings are dropped.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE