Albert Abey.V.S v. Shabna.T.V.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 570 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).35293/2014 ----------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35293/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-01-2015 PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):

----------------------------------- ALBERT ABEY.V.S AGED 43 YEARS S/O.LATE ADVOCATE V.A.SAURUNNY, VEVUKKATTU HOUSE T-SQUARE LANE, PACHALAM P.O., COCHIN-682012.

BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):

---------------------------------------- SHABNA.T.V., AGED 38 YEARS FATHER'S/MOTHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VARAPUZHA VILLAGE, VARAPUZHA P.O., PARAVUR TALUK PINCODE-683517.

R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

COC NO. 570 OF 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE A1 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.((C) NO. 35293 OF 2014 DATED 07.01.2015 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE PHOTOSTATE COPY OF THE SPEED POST A/D SIGNED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 19.01.2015 ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. H4-651/2015 DATED 03.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PARUR TO THE PETITIONER.

ANNEXURE A4 : TRUE PHOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3.03.2015 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cont. Case No. 570 of 2015 against W.P.(C) No. 35293 of 2014 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 22nd day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader submits that the direction given by this Court as per Annexure A1 judgment has already been complied with by passing an order on 20.07.2015. It is stated that steps have already been taken to serve a copy of the said order to the petitioner forthwith. The said submission is recorded. In the said circumstances, the contempt matter is closed without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to challenge the order as aforesaid, if aggrieved. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd //True copy/ P.A. To Judge