T.K Biju v. Dr.K.Vijayakumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 595 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT DATED 30-06-2014 IN WP(C) 14563/2012. ........

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC:

------------------------------------------------------

1. T.K BIJU, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.T.G.KUNJUMON, SECURITY GUARD, TECHNICAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, PEERIMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT, RESIDING AT THEKKIRICKKAL HOUSE, PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

2. GANGAPRASAD.S, SECURITY GUARD, COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCE, PWD REST HOUSE, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, KUTIKANAM (PO), PEERUMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT, RESIDING AT VALIYAPURACKAL HOUSE, CHENKARA POST, VIA. VANDIPERIYAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN W.P.(C):

------------------------------------------------------------------ DR.K.VIJAYAKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE, PRAJOE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MOHAMMED, SC, THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

Con.Case(C).No. 595 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A :

A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)14563 OF2012 DATED 30.6.2014.

ANNEXURE B :

COPY OF THE CLAIM MADE BY THE PETITIONERS DATED 1.7.2014.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- Contempt Court Case (C). No. 595 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The directions in the judgment have been complied in the 92nd meeting of the Executive committee, IHRD by constituting a committee to study the service conditions of 104 consolidated paid employees including the petitioners.

2.

In that view of the above, there shall be a further direction to finalise the proceedings based on the constitution of the meeting within a period of 3 months.

This Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.

Pn