T.Chandraprakash v. Gopinathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/28TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Con.Case(C).No. 600 of 2015 (S) ------------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 6068/2015 DATED 26-02-2015) ---------------- PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
----------------------------------------- T.CHANDRAPRAKASH, HEAD MASTER (UNDER SUSPENSION), AIDED JUNIOR BASIC SCHOOL, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD -678 633, RESIDING AT KRISHNA KRIPA, THAZHATHETHIL HOUSE, POST KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD -678 633.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.K.CHANDRASEKHARAN SRI.S.RAMESH (KOLLENGODE) RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. SRI.GOPINATHAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,MANAGER, AIDED JUNIOR BASIC SCHOOL, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD- 678 633.
2. SRI.M.K. RAVI,S/O.LATE M.C.KUMARA GUPTAN,AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HEADMASTER IN CHARGE, AIDED JUNIOR BASIC SCHOOL, KATAMPAZHIPURAM, PALAKKAD - 678 633.
3. JAYARAJ, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD.
R1 BY ADVS. SRI.JIJI THOMAS SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR R2 BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.T.SHEEBA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.600/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 26/03/2015 IN WP(C).NO.6068 OF 2015.
ANNEX II COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. ANNEX III COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE HM IN CHARGE, I.E. RESPONDENTNO.2 IN THIS CONTEMPT CASE.
ANNEX IV COPY OF THE CONTEMPTOUS LETTER ISSUED BY THE MANAGER I.E. RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CONTEMPT CASE.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------ Cont.Case(C).No.600 of 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Both the counsel submit that the direction of this Court has already been complied with.
In view of the above, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
AV